[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014


Mads Villadsen <maxx@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |maxx@xxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #11 from Mads Villadsen <maxx@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-04-06 07:23:22 EDT ---
I think it would make sense to split up the plugins in different subpackages
only where there is an extra external dependency.

So for instance something like this:

gnome-do-plugins (contains all the "basic" plugins)
gnome-do-plugins-evolution (plugins for evolution)
gnome-do-plugins-banshee (plugins for banshee)
gnome-do-plugins-flickr (plugins for flickr)

So if I do an install of gnome-do and gnome-do-plugins I don't end up pulling
in a lot of stuff I don't need as dependencies.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]