Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-05 13:55:34 EDT --- Felix, Thanks for the offer to swap reviews, you're lucky as one of the packages I wanted to have reviewed turns out to already be a part of Fedora, so you only need to review 2 packages. Taking review, no full review done yet. My first concern with this package is (was) the legal status of it. But it looks like it is a properly licensed original creation so no issues there. However it comes licenses as GPL, but does not come with sources that is a show stopper. Can you please request the sources (and build instructions) from FooBar (as described in the README). Since this is GPL, we really need to be shipping with sources to meet the legal requirements. And the build from source to meet Fedora's own guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review