[Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521


Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-04-05 13:19:09 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> 
> > Can you please help me understand why to use AutoProv and why not to filter and
> > remove unnecessary provides perl(DB)?  
> 
> Sure :-)  DB is used by the Perl debugger, and as such, is sometimes poked
> at...  It shouldn't be provided by this package.  In this case, turning off
> autoprov and manually providing perl(Log::Trace) is significantly easier than
> filtering the two provides autoprov finds.  ...we've also done this before,
> e.g. perl-DateTime-Format-DBI.  

@Chis: Please understand that I do not agree with your rationale. I consider
this kind of packaging to be grossly negligant sloppiness.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]