Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 492113 depends on bug 492110, which changed state. Bug 492110 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsigc++20 - MinGW Windows port of the typesafe signal framework for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-05 03:27:13 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-glibmm24-2.19.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-05 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license * The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package * The package contains the license file (COPYING) * The spec file is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream 9915c92a5a4b55fc2696bedf0d7af4cb glibmm-2.19.2.tar.bz2 9915c92a5a4b55fc2696bedf0d7af4cb SRPM/glibmm-2.19.2.tar.bz2 Accoding to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package - which it does. (It looks like there is an update of the corresponding Fedora package to 2.20.0 in preparation - the glibmm24 spec in CVS has been updated, so look out for that.) Fedora 10 has 2.18.1 (in case a Fedora 10 package is planned) * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires look sane * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review