Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #26 from Gerd Pokorra <gp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-02 04:38:25 EDT --- I modified the spec-file and build the source rpm (.src.rpm) again. The URLs for this latest files are still the same: Spec: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/specs/parrot.spec SRPM: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/SRPMS/parrot-1.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm - take the parrot source in .src.rpm from svn-revision 37835 - add commands to reduce output of errors when using rpmlint - define RPM_PAR_LIB_DIR added The scratch builds with "koji" from Fedora 8 to Fedora 11 still finished successful, the URLs are: f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272316 f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272363 f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272424 f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272461 Although "rpmlint" output of parrot rpms writes a lot of errors. I place the output of rpmlint under a directory with the URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/rpmlint The most errors occurs because parrots build system is for different operation systems und use explicit calls to execute scripts. I think this should not aviod the review. Would anyone of the Fedora rpm experts say my if rpmlint errors should still reduced or if it does not matter? P.S. I have holiday until 8th April and go on a trip. So I will not look and work at this before the 9th April. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review