Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-02 01:16:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272037 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 773aefa7539b1857edb3e225cfbc4a22 Log-Trace-1.070.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=13, Tests=80, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.03 sys + 0.38 cusr 0.08 csys = 0.54 CPU) + Package perl-Log-Trace-1.070-1.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(Log::Trace) = 1.070 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Fcntl) perl(strict) perl(vars) Can you please help me understand why to use AutoProv and why not to filter and remove unnecessary provides perl(DB)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review