Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437574 --- Comment #3 from Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-31 09:47:01 EDT --- Here are the new sets: SRPM: http://www.gunduz.org/temp/ruby-pg-0.7.9.2008.08.17-1.f9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.gunduz.org/temp/ruby-pg.spec The only issues I saw is: ruby-pg.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7.9.2008.08.17-1 ['0.7.9.2008.08.17-1.f9', '0.7.9.2008.08.17-1.f9'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. I think we can ignore this, right? ruby-pg.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided ruby-postgres If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the Provides. This package is provided in Fedora. What does this message mean? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review