Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #35 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-30 14:49:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > Comment 14 starts with comments on the the buffer overflow/security issues. I file bug to upstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980#c14 > > Hmmm. It is generated by standard %find_lang macros. > It isn't. The %find_lang macro only finds message/translation object files. And generate file of list it. Aftre that it used also in standard way: %files -f %{name}.lang What there wrong? > > configure patched to use those flags. I assume there all right. > Not true. Wrong assumption. I had to disagree there. In standard configure script it place this flags 'CFLAGS=-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -Os' into Makefile.settings. But as you can see in build.log it compiled with standard Fedora flags, where only few upstrem defined flagw was reseeded: CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=athlon -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' ... gcc -c axel.c -o axel.o -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=athlon -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -Os -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review