Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-03-30 10:03:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Source0 with full URL: How does that work? How does rpmbuild use the URL? > What if the person running it has no internet connectivity at the time? Does > 'make newbase' use this instead of the 'mirrors' file now? If not, is there an > enhancement bugzilla filed to integrate the two so the same info is not stored > in two places? IIUC rpmbuild doesn't use the URL per se, but you can get the sources with spectool -g specfile.spec This way you don't have to download the sources by hand whenever a new version is released. (In reply to comment #10) > We do not 'provide' lvm. > lvm is the old obsolete package which does not form part of Fedora 10, but > might be present on a system if someone is installing the rpm on an old system > and which has to be removed. 'lvm2' version numbers are independent of 'lvm' > version numbers. Okay, it seems I have misunderstood the need for Provides. If lvm2 is not compatible with lvm, then the provides line must not be there. (In reply to comment #11) > What does '%{?_smp_mflags}' expand to? Then yes, someone needs to tackle > fixing the build to work with it. It's expanded as -j (number of cores on system), as specified in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros: %_smp_mflags %([ -z "$RPM_BUILD_NCPUS" ] \\\ && RPM_BUILD_NCPUS="`/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN`"; \\\ [ "$RPM_BUILD_NCPUS" -gt 1 ] && echo "-j$RPM_BUILD_NCPUS") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review