Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-23 10:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=134711) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134711&action=view) Build log of gcin-1.2.2-8 on fc6-devel with fedora undefined Hello. So I cannot sponsor formally for this package (because I am not a member), who will be the sponsor for this package? I think that this package leaves "little" problem, so it would be better that this package can be released ASAP. The reason I mentioned "little" is because * I can rebuild this package with mock. * however, I canNOT rebuild this package without mock even with proper BR rpms installed because usually %{fedora} is undefined and so Patch5 is applied when rebuilt withOUT mock, this is not right for FC5 and above. Now, FC4 and below FC4 are marked as regacy, so this package can be released only for FE5 and FE6-devel. So, Patch5 is not needed, perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review