Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #27 from Philippe Makowski <makowski.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-28 07:06:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > * I, personally, don't like naming scheme at all. In fact neitheir do I ;) but see below explanations > I suspect that adding > lib-prefixes and "2" as postfix for library-subpackages is redundant. Ad one > more - why so many servers (classic, super and related subpackages) and related > utils-subpackages? However, this may be generally accepted naming scheme among > firebird-users, but in any case - please explain it. Firebird exist in to Flavor : Classic server and SuperServer cf http://firebirdsql.org/manual/qsg2-classic-or-super.html Firebird project build the two flavor as two packages Mandriva, Debian chose the way you see it, on meta package with subpackages. I'm no against the idea of reworking the naming schema, but do you have some suggestion ? I will work on others problems, thanks for the report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review