Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #34 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese@xxxxxx> 2009-03-28 09:54:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > > - What I meant by the previous comment is that it looks strange > that there is /usr/share/rear/skel/default/lib64 directory but > /usr/share/rear/skel/default/usr/lib64 does not exist in > this package, for example. > I did an experiment with FC9 on a x86_64 platform: - ran 'rear mkrescue' of rear-1.7.19 without modification and - once with creating an empty directory under skel/usr/lib64 and ran 'rear mkrescue' again Boot initrd were extracted in a temporary directory to compare the file structure: [root@sloeber lib64]# ls -l /tmp/rootfs/usr total 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 2009-03-28 12:49 bin -> ../bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 2009-03-28 12:49 lib -> ../lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2009-03-28 12:49 sbin -> bin drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2009-03-28 12:49 share [root@sloeber lib64]# ls -l /tmp/rootfs_2/usr total 8 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 2009-03-28 14:41 bin -> ../bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 2009-03-28 14:41 lib -> ../lib drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2009-03-28 14:41 lib64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2009-03-28 14:41 sbin -> bin drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2009-03-28 14:41 share [root@sloeber lib64]# ls -l /tmp/rootfs_2/usr/lib64/ The /usr/lib64 directory remains empty. If you wish we could make a symlink to ../../lib64? Did a boot test with the first iso image, which went fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review