Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #4 from nucleo <alekcejk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-28 10:34:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) - Fixed owener of /usr/share/kvirc - Changed release tag and license field Scriptlets are exactly as on your link. Now builds are in default directory. --vendor "" removed from desktop-file-install. I didn't notice any difference between kvirc running with /usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/ directory and without it. (In reply to comment #3) Now version 4.0.0. New spec and srpm Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kvirc/kvirc.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kvirc/kvirc-4.0.0-0.1.20090328svn3168.fc10.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1263073 $ rpmlint kvirc-4.0.0-0.1.20090328svn3168.fc10.src.rpm kvirc-4.0.0-0.1.20090328svn3168.fc10.i386.rpm kvirc-debuginfo-4.0.0-0.1.20090328svn3168.fc10.i386.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review