Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491425 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-28 11:05:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > GPLv2 or GPLv3 is functionally equivalent to GPLv2 or any later version (as the > only later version is GPLv3). This is true right now. But it will stop being true the moment a new version of GPL is published, and you can not rely on that a new version of GPL will never ever be released. If upstream will not change the license so that all files are released under the same license, the Fedora package must state all licenses, which will be something like: License: GPLv2+ and (GPLv2 or GPLv3) see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Combined_Dual_and_Multiple_Licensing_Scenario It will be a rather weird statement - preferably upstream should be asked about their inconsistent licensing, so that it can be resolved for something more reasonable. If upstream is unable or unwilling to change it, you should state all licenses as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review