Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-03-27 09:42:38 EDT --- rpmlint output: hfsutils.src:202: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr hfsutils.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Tools for reading and writing Macintosh HFS volumes. hfsutils.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Tools for reading and writing Macintosh HFS volumes. hfsutils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation hfsutils-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A C library for reading and writing Macintosh HFS volumes. hfsutils-x11.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A Tk-based front end for browsing and copying files. 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. - Fix the above. - Drop empty %config line in %files. - Change buildroot to %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) - Drop INSTALL from %doc since it really isn't necessary. Also README can be dropped, since it is too about compilation. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK SHOULD: Use INSTALL="install -p" as additional argument to make install to preserve time stamps. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NEEDSFIX - Devel package needs to provide %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release} MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. ? - Any comment on this? In this case base package only contains binaries, so there's no need to require the base package. Consider including the %doc also in -devel, though. MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review