[Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862





--- Comment #1 from Tejas Dinkar <tejasdinkar@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-03-27 07:08:54 EDT ---
This is my first review, and I'm using this guide:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review

Points to Check on:

* package did NOT build on PPC. Please see
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1260790&name=build.log for
more details

* Is it possible to use %_qt4_plugindir rather than '%define qtplugindir
%(qmake-qt4 -query QT_INSTALL_PLUGINS)'

Mandatory Tests:

* rpmlint passes with no errors or warnings:
$ rpmlint SRPMS/kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm
RPMS/i386/kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm
RPMS/i386/kde-style-skulpture-debuginfo-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm
SPECS/kde-style-skulpture.spec
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

* package is named as per Package Naming Guidelines

* spec filename matched name

* Package meets Packaging Guidelines

* Package is GPLv3 licensed

* License verified in COPYING file

* %doc includes Copying

* spec in american english

* specfile is legible

* sources match the upstream

* package compiles on (at least i386)

* no ExcludeArch

* all dependencies listed

* no locales (not needed as this is a theme)

* package is not relocatable

* package does creates one directory. It uses directories from kde-filesystem
(which it depends on implicitly)

* no file is listed more than once

* permissions correctly set

* clean section is correct

* package consistently uses macros

* package contains only code

* no doc subpackage required

* %doc files are optional

* no header files present, so no -devel package

* no static subpackage needed

* no pkgconfig files

* no library files with a suffix

* no -devel package

* no .la libtool archives present

* package is not a gui application, so need not run desktop-file-install

* package does not own files owned by other packages

* %install runs rm -rf %{buildroot}

* package is UTF-8 valid

Optional Items:

* Source package contains a COPYING file

* No translations in spec file

* Package does NOT build on all architecture:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1260789
Package fails to build on PPC architecture

* Package runs as advertises, and stlye resembles the screenshot upstream

* no scriptlets used

* no subpackages

* no pkgconfig files

* package has no file dependencies

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]