Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-22 16:32 EST ------- OK, now what to do with (potential) Conflicts: openmotif ? <braindump> 1. What left in the main/core pkgs conflict (lesstif vs openmotif)? xmbind? We may want to split that out into -clients again to avoid that problem (for now). 2. -devel: the -devel pkgs conflict (right?), and that's allowable (imo), so having a Conflicts: openmotif-devel isn't unreasonable 3. Since openmotif's status is still not 100% certain, we could do something funky like adding a virtual Provides for motif and motif-devel (and if openmotif ever clears up it's status, it could add these too), so only could add something like (to main): Provides: motif = 2.1 and to -devel Provides: motif-devel = 2.1 (the 2.1 is based on what version of the motif api it provides). </braindump> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review