Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #56 from Justin Zygmont <solarflow99@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-25 19:45:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #55) > (In reply to comment #53) > Daniel, > > this is not just about "Perfect" vs. "Good", this is a matter of "Free" vs. > "Non-free". See, if the only precondition for including the software in Fedora > would be usability, we'd almost certainly ship non-free nvidia drivers and the > such. Being strict about freedom to modify the software is among the important > things that makes Fedora special, compared to, say, Ubuntu (which > coincidentally goes as far, as shipping binary-only drivers). > > Now, to be constructive, the effort to get this packaged is definitely not > lost. It can be included in RPMFusion repository [1]. I'm willing to review it > there, and provide any kind of help that's needed. > > [1] http://rpmfusion.org/ ya, I guess it would make sense then. Do you know how much is involved to get it into rpmfusion? Because I cant see anyone using dosemu without an included DOS image to boot up with, it would be useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review