Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-24 12:12:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > Some quick notes: > > > > > > > > - ldconfig does not need to be required since it's part of glibc. > > > > > > You're sure that won't get us into a situation where the package gets installed > > > before the binary's there? > > > > Unless there is dependency loop between glibc and this package, > > this must not happen (and if there is such dependency loop, > > perhaps it is a bug on this package) > > I'm afraid I don't follow. Can you elaborate? I was under the impression that > without any explicit ordering information, RPM would be free to install them in > any order. No, If so reviewers would already file a bug against rpm. see (for now I cannot find more "proper" URL) http://markmail.org/message/hwihrwnis5ikd34f and Requires are automatically added by libraries' dependencies detected by rpmbuild itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review