Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-24 11:56:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Some quick notes: > > > > - ldconfig does not need to be required since it's part of glibc. > > You're sure that won't get us into a situation where the package gets installed > before the binary's there? Unless there is dependency loop between glibc and this package, this must not happen (and if there is such dependency loop, perhaps it is a bug on this package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review