Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-24 11:03:41 EDT --- Ok on the docs, names and ldconfig. Re: the license, I thought if using a GPLed library, the GPL version of the code must be >= the GPL version of the library? Or so I have that wrong? Or do the +s moot the whole thing? Re: the patches, so essentially these allow us to work around an upstream limitation that upstream will be fixing in another manner? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review