[Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(splinux25@xxxxxxxx|
                   |m)                          |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-08-21 21:52 EST -------
I think there must be some sort of communication problem here.  The way this
works is that reviewers make comments and point out things that need to be
changed.  You should either make the indicated changes or discuss why you think
those changes shouldn't be made.  Instead, you seem to be ignoring most of the
comments.

The following issues have not been addressed:
  Still owns %{_datadir}/pixmaps.
  %description still says Gstm instead of gSTM.

In addition, could you also comment on Laurent's comment that gaskpass should be
in a separate package?  (I admit to not understanding the issue here; perhaps
Laurent could elaborate.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]