[Bug 490438] Review Request: rhn-client-tools - Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490438





--- Comment #3 from Nigel Jones <nigjones@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-03-24 08:02:09 EDT ---
Okay, sorry about taking so long for the first glance...

At the moment I see two issues against the current guidelines:

1. Missing .desktop files

I know for a fact that Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3-5 has a GUI for
'rhn_register' and based on what I'm seeing I'm fairly sure you haven't taken
it away, so per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files it really
needs a .desktop file so users can find it in the menus.

2. Python module locations

I'm not sure how set in stone this is, but w/ our Python Guidelines, python
modules are prefered to be in %{python_sitelib}/modulename/foo.*
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture) would
moving these libraries cause any issues with rhn_register etc?

As per our discussion on IRC, I also mentioned about the ownership of a couple
of directories...

/etc/sysconfig/rhn/allowed-actions/
/etc/sysconfig/rhn/allowed-actions/script/

Should these be owned by rhn-client-tools or is there going to be another
package that provides the rhncfg packages that check for files under these
directories?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]