Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #5 from Mohammed Morsi <mmorsi@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-23 20:07:04 EDT --- Uploaded new versions of the spec and srpm. Changes included: * license is now GPLv2+ * gcc-c++ removed * %{?_smp_mflags} added * correct user/group management, using getent and not deleting them on uninstall Changes ommitted: * boost still included, not sure whether you were referring to the boost req or boost-devel buildreq (or both) and if they actually will be pulled in (preliminary googling it reveals many specs w/ that req included, are they erroneous?) * source0 location, essentially I checked out the code from the anyterm svn repo trunk, added the spec, init and sysconfig scripts, made a few changes to the code base, and then generated / submitted the srpm and spec here. I'm not sure how exactly my changes, specifically the new files I added and the changes to the code will be available and make my way into the codebase when listing the hosted anyterm release tarball Appreciate the help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review