Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465858 --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-03-23 19:11:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I'm the author of afpfs-ng, and there definitely are stability problems with > it. I am currently working on these bugs (mostly related to making it thread > safe). > > That said, please report your afpfs-ng bugs so I can ensure that they are > fixed. I'm having trouble capturing useful debugging information, since the problems I've encountered seem to be very racy. What I've been able to track down is included in the patch that's in the package (I think I've already mailed it to you some time ago). > I'll leave it up to you to decide if you want to include it in FC10, but > everyone will be happier with an upcoming release of afpfs-ng. Is there a timeframe? In any case, an update can be pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review