[Bug 225978] Merge Review: kudzu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225978





--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx>  2009-03-23 16:37:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> It's translated as part of the specspo package.  

Okay, then it has to wait until F11 is released. You can add a comment to the
spec file about the need to fix the summaries, however!

Review for 1.2.86-1 as follows:

rpmlint output:
kudzu.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot The Red Hat Linux hardware probing tool.
kudzu.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot The Red Hat Linux hardware probing
tool.
kudzu-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Development files needed for
hardware probing using kudzu.
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

- Is it really necessary to have the documentation in the devel package too?
I'd prune these.

Review:
? source files match upstream (no srpm provided)
X package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
X specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.

- dist tag is present.
 MUST: Add this.

X build root is correct.
X license field matches the actual license.
X license is open source-compatible.
X license text included in package.
X latest version is being packaged.

X BuildRequires are proper.
 * Please clean the conflicts, requires and buildrequires. ideally they should
be given one per line in alphabetical order

X compiler flags are appropriate.
X %clean is present.
X package builds in mock.
X package installs properly.
X debuginfo package looks complete.

? rpmlint is silent.
 * The summaries still need fixing.

X final provides and requires are sane
X no check available
X no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
X owns the directories it creates.
X doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
X no duplicates in %files.
X file permissions are appropriate.
X no scriptlets present.
X code, not content.
X documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
X %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
X headers are in devel package

- static libraries are in static package
 * The devel package needs to Provides: kudzu-static=%{version}-%{release}

X no pkgconfig files.
X no libtool .la droppings.
X no desktop files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]