[Bug 203042] Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jakarta-oro (RENAME ONLY)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203042


jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|188265                      |188268
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-08-21 15:10 EST -------
Since epoch is 0, you don't need to list that as part of our Provides.  (or in
the spec at all)

Do you really need to define name, version, and release, just to fill them in at
Name: Version: and Release:?  Please don't do that.

Othewise looks ok, for a java package (:

Please create an srpm with the new name and import it as jakarta-oro.  We'll
stop using the 'oro' module.  This would be a good time to change the release
string to remove the _.

Added to dist-fc6.  Please close when built into rawhide.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]