[Bug 491550] Review Request: libass - Portable library for SSA/ASS subtitles rendering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491550


Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-03-22 20:06:55 EDT ---
Full review:

rpmlint clean:
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result
libass-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

source matches upstream:
$ md5sum libass-0.9.6.tar.bz2 libass-0.9.6.tar.bz2.orig 
58d9fa08eedc27edae05b53288025370  libass-0.9.6.tar.bz2
58d9fa08eedc27edae05b53288025370  libass-0.9.6.tar.bz2.orig

Builds fine in mock(devel/x86_64).

Just one small issue:
Redundant BuildRequires:
glibc-devel (required by gcc, which is in exceptions)
freetype-devel (required by fontconfig-devel)

Other than that it's fine.

This package is APPROVED.
(But please fix the redundant BRs upon import.)

I also encourage you to work with avidemux maintainer (in RPM Fusion) to
unbundle its internal copy of libass.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]