Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491550 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-22 20:06:55 EDT --- Full review: rpmlint clean: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result libass-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. source matches upstream: $ md5sum libass-0.9.6.tar.bz2 libass-0.9.6.tar.bz2.orig 58d9fa08eedc27edae05b53288025370 libass-0.9.6.tar.bz2 58d9fa08eedc27edae05b53288025370 libass-0.9.6.tar.bz2.orig Builds fine in mock(devel/x86_64). Just one small issue: Redundant BuildRequires: glibc-devel (required by gcc, which is in exceptions) freetype-devel (required by fontconfig-devel) Other than that it's fine. This package is APPROVED. (But please fix the redundant BRs upon import.) I also encourage you to work with avidemux maintainer (in RPM Fusion) to unbundle its internal copy of libass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review