Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 --- Comment #3 from Felix Kaechele <felix@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-21 04:17:17 EDT --- Here are some things I found that should be fixed before I start the final review: - the package misses the BuildDependency mesa-libGL-devel - the package obsoletes a package that has never been in Fedora - the gnome subpackage should do a stricter Require. E.g. %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - fix the following rpmlint errors: compiz-fusion-unsupported.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported compiz-fusion-unsupported.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: no-documentation compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-atlantis.schemas compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-snow.schemas compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-mswitch.schemas compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-tile.schemas compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-fakeargb.schemas - you could improve the legibility of the specfile by making use of indentation but that's just an idea and not required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review