Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #34 from Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-20 13:54:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > News: Upstream cannot reproduce the test failure ... and still thinks it is > somehow related to not finding a file. Doubtful IMO, also after checking strace > -- the wrong value found during the test is read from a file which is created > from scratch. Hopefully they'll be able to figure it out. > eclib.spec should "BuildRequires: ntl-static" instead of ntl-devel, because NTL > is a static-only package. Due to a bug in ntl.spec, ntl-devel didn't provide > ntl-static so far. ntl-5.4.2-7.fc11 shall fix this. Ah, thanks. http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/eclib.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/eclib-20080310-5.p7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review