Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459751 --- Comment #7 from Rick L Vinyard Jr <rvinyard@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-19 12:23:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > Let me know what you think on these items, and then I'll push out a new > > upstream release and post a new spec/srpm. > > Can we have a fresh Spec/SRPM pair? I pushed out a new upstream release that fixes things like the license in the Makefiles, the pkgconfig .pc files, etc. This spec has all the above mentioned items fixed. I'd really like to keep the name at osgGtk to not only match the osg library names, but to also make it easier when I figure out how to get autoconf to name the dist packages osgGtk-0.1.4.tar.bz2. I've tried to keep the case notation consistent since programmers #include<osgGtk.h> or #include<osgGtkmm.h> http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/osgGtk.spec http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/osgGtk-0.1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review