Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From wart@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-20 15:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I think moving the files but leaving the perl(...) Provides in is worse than > leaving the files in the usual locations (and leaving the Provides intact). > Moving should be coupled with Provides (and probably Requires due to comment 8) > filtering but that's of questionable gain anyway, I'd revert moving the files > and doing things as usual. My main concerns with leaving the files in %{perl_vendorarch} is that these are application-specific perl modules. They have no use outside of this package. I strongly prefer moving things like this into application specific directories such as %{_libdir}/%{name} instead of polluting the language library tree. I know languages like python and Tcl can handle this with no problem, which is why I advocated doing it here as well. It seems to me that we have two choices here: 1) Move the files to %{_libdir}/%{name} and turn off the autoprovides/autorequires for the perl modules 2) Leave the files where they are and live with obscurities like perl(fbsyms) and perl(fb_c_stuff) in the system-wide perl library tree. If the current standard practice for app-specific perl modules is #2 then I won't argue, even though I think it's a bad policy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review