Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490397 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-18 01:33:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > One comment, for naming: > > > > - On Fedora, "compat-" package meant is to provide binary compatibility > > for old applications and no packages on Fedora are allowed to > > build against "compat-" package, c.f. > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-February/msg01009.html > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310#c7 > > > > If this package wants to provide -devel subpackage, this must > > be named differently. > > That can't be true across the board. For example compat-libosip2 provides a > shared library that linphone (and other apps) link against. Yes, even _me_ didn't know this (i.e. the meaning of "compat-") before (actually I approved "compat-guile-16"), but I have already seen that many reviewers say that "compat-" is meant as so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review