Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490397 --- Comment #10 from Alex Lancaster <alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-18 01:12:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > One comment, for naming: > > - On Fedora, "compat-" package meant is to provide binary compatibility > for old applications and no packages on Fedora are allowed to > build against "compat-" package, c.f. > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-February/msg01009.html > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310#c7 > > If this package wants to provide -devel subpackage, this must > be named differently. That can't be true across the board. For example compat-libosip2 provides a shared library that linphone (and other apps) link against. # rpm -q compat-libosip2 --provides libosip2.so.3 libosipparser2.so.3 compat-libosip2 = 2.2.2-16.fc9 # rpm -q --whatrequires libosip2.so.3 compat-libosip2-2.2.2-16.fc9.i386 libeXosip2-3.1.0-1.fc9.i386 linphone-2.1.1-1.fc9.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review