Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487791 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-16 14:52:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Steven, there is absolutely no need to use ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} instead of %{buildroot}. The only requirement ( enforced by fedora, and not for a technical but for a mere cosmetic reason ) is to use only one set of macros in all the spec. nucleo does that, so there is absolutely no problem from this point of view. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS for details. What could be changed is '--vendor ""' which is not needed in fedora (but IS required if the same spec is to be used for RHEL - the older desktop-file-install barfs if there exists no vendor field) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review