Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-16 08:57:03 EDT --- rpmlint says: coccinelle.src:77: W: configure-without-libdir-spec coccinelle.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h See comment 2 for both of these. coccinelle.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/dllpycaml_stubs.so See comment 12. coccinelle-examples.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/coccinelle-examples-0.1.5/demos/launch.sh coccinelle-examples.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/coccinelle-examples-0.1.5/demos/launch.sh R I believe rpmlint is wrong here, and/or the packaging guidelines aren't sufficiently specific about whether examples scripts can be executable. See: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/thread.html#00355 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487527#c3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review