[Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758


Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |atorkhov@xxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #19 from Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-03-13 06:53:43 EDT ---
I went forward and did the review. Here it is with few comments:

+ rpmlint output clean
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

+ The package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
  %{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
  Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.

That is providing, that it'll be changed to "CC-BY and Freely redistributable
without restriction".

+ File, containing the text of the licenses for the package is included in
  %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source.

Source command to export SVN is actually wrong. It should have either "-r 9"
or "@9" but not combination of those.

+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
  one primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ No need to deal with locales.
+ The package does not designed to be relocatable.
+ A package owns all directories that it creates.
+ A package does not list a file more than once in %files listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
+ Package consistently uses macros.
+ Does not contain large documentation files.
+ Includes only doc files in %doc.
+ Includes %{name}.desktop file. Properly installed with desktop-file-install.
+ Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
+ Package builds in mock.
+ Package functions as described.

Unfortunately, upstream's make system is made in such way so it doesn't
support paralleling - it compresses one file per time. Perhaps, this
should be addressed upstream.


This package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]