Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #16 from Brennan Ashton <bashton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-13 01:34:26 EDT --- Here is an updated spec and srpm: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/tinycc-0.9.24-4.fc10.src.rpm http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/tinycc.spec The static is required to even think about running, so I merged that into the main package. Devel is need for some programs but not all, I am not sure what to do, it is small and anything requiring stdio.h will require it. I do not see why this would be bad here and ok with gcc? tinycc-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib The program has (from what I understand) and inherent SELinux issue. To run correctly you need to disable the SELinux bool for memheap protection. What should I do with this. You can still compile and run, which defeats most of the purpose (still 10 time faster then gcc for may compiles). As for being arch specific, I could see it go either way. I would be leaning towards yes, because of float.h which sets some variable sizes which may be different in 64bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review