[Bug 488407] Review Request: python-text_table - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488407


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-03-12 15:03:11 EDT ---
I believe the license issue is sufficiently resolved.

rpmlint says:
  python-text_table.noarch: E: non-executable-script 
   /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/text_table.py 0644
This is the usual "starts with a shebang but isn't executable" problem.  I
still have no idea why python programmers do this.  I don't particularly think
it's a problem but you can sed out the shebang line if you like.

  python-text_table.noarch: E: description-line-too-long This module provides
an 
   interface to output simple ASCII tables.  It is based on
That goes right to 80 characters.  That's really the only real problem I see,
so I'll approve this and you can reflow the %description when you check in.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
   e66bb3f653879b7799b7928b762bbba2fd086c17f3fc55891c92c796be9c5f48  
   text_table-0.02.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
X rpmlint has a valid complaint.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   python-text_table = 0.02-2.fc11
  =
   python(abi) = 2.6

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED, just re-wrap the description.

The package review process needs reviewers!  If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]