Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-12 12:56:28 EDT --- Some remarks and questions * Shipping "rear.8" as %doc is really confusing for this package - because the installed rear.8.gz man file (modified by sed command) _differs_ (i.e. is saying something different) sfrom the original rear.8 installed as %doc. Please remove "rear.8" from %doc * The installed man files are actually gzipped by rpmbuild itself. Please leave stripping man files to rpmbuild and don't strip by yourself. ? It seems that this package installs somefiles which are related to the distributions different from Fedora (like /usr/share/rear/build/"Debian" or so). Would you explain why these files are needed? ? Would you check if your rpm work on 64 bits architecture? For example, this package contains /usr/share/rear/skel/default/lib64 but does not have /usr/share/rear/skel/default/usr/lib64 . Is this as expected? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review