Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Sanderson <conradsand@xxxxxxxx> 2009-03-12 09:36:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Move the headers and lib*.so into *-devel > and let the main-package only contain lib*.x.y.z Hello, I've followed your recommendations and redone the spec file, as well as CMakeLists.txt. %{_libdir} should (hopefully) be honoured. The updated files are: Spec URL: http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo.spec SRPM URL: http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo-0.5.3-1.src.rpm > BTW: Unless I am mistaken, this package builds its libs stripped. > In Fedora, libs are supposed to be built unstripped (rpm strips them later). I don't have any explicit stripping, but the output from rpmbuild has these two lines: + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump However, the above messages are amongst other stuff regarding java and python bytecompile, which has nothing to do with this package. If a stripped library build is occuring, is "/brp-strip-static-archive" responsible? If so, how is it turned off ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review