Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxx 2006-08-18 02:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > MUSTFIX: lib-devel contains pkgconfig file(s), so it ought to: > Requires: pkgconfig Hmm... is this to get the correct directory structure? Because a owner of .pc files has no need for the pkgconfig command (the users of the .pc files are the ones that need the command). > > Can you explain/justify the existence of *both* a pulseaudio-devel and a > pulseaudio-libs-devel pkg? > Of course. :) pulseaudio-devel is the headers and libraries for building modules for the server. pulseaudio-libs-devel is the headers and libraries for building PulseAudio clients. > I'm also inclined to say that there's needless complexity splitting out separate > packages for module-alsa, lib-glib2, lib-zeroconf subpkgs. These are pretty > low-level, core libraries that will (should?!) be present on any > audio-capable/desktop-config machine. I couldn't find any reasonable list of libraries that are "always present", so I went with the approach of least dependencies. Note though that a machine running pulseaudio server/clients isn't necesariliy a desktop machine. You could have a machine hooked up to output sound on your living room stereo, or you could have a dedicated mp3 player (HTPC perhaps) that you want to stream data somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review