Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488359 Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dan@xxxxxxxx) | --- Comment #5 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> 2009-03-09 06:28:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > - upstream download page says that 0.9.4 is the latest version > > (https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42302) => check with > > upstream > > I got this direct from Intel. I can harass them to update the stuff on their > sourceforge page, but this is the latest. That's what I have expected :-) It's not a blocker, the source URL works, but should be fixed. > > - wants to build with the included libconfig => BuildRequires: libconfig-devel > > is missing, but then it fails to build on Rawhide due some undefined symbols > > during linking > > Can you paste of attach the build failure message? I was able to build and > install it just find on an f11 alpha system. Did you have "libconfig-devel" installed? > > - are the headers alone in -devel subpackage (no library there) useful for any > > development? > > They are useful for anyone who might want to write an app that builds on the > infrastructure in place and used by dcbtool/dcbd. I think it could probably be > dropped though. OK Jan should be already in contact with you, because he was designated as the maintainer of dcbd package in the BaseOS Engineering. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review