Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #13 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-09 04:18:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > This failed to build for me in rawhide; it looks like it will need some fixes > in order to build with gcc 4.4: > OK - once I get my devel machine working with gcc 4.4 I'll fix this (waiting for the beta freeze) > > About the rpmlint complaints, the unused-direct-shlib-dependency ones just > indicate that a library is linked against libm but doesn't actually call any > functions in it. It's not really a problem. > > All of the undefined-non-weak symbol complaints come from the fact that one > library calls functions in another without being linked against it. Things > still work because the the final executables link against all of the libraries. > It's really bad form, but unless the libraries are expected to be used by > other packages it's not really a huge problem. It's something I would complain > to upstream about and perhaps try to work out a fix (after all, it is a lot of > rpmlint warnings and it shouldn't be all that hard to make them go away) but I > don't think it would block this review. > Thanks for the tips. I've sent all my patches upstream, hopefully the next point release will fix most of these problems. > Also, you probably don't want to pass --vendor=fedora to desktop-file-install. Oops, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review