Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-08 17:56:10 EDT --- Thanks for your help. (In reply to comment #4) > - a test-suite is included in the sources in the "check" directory, you should > add a %check section containing "make check" into the spec file At the moment there is an issue with the 'check' -------<%--------- BC=8, KC=8, Inverse difference a0[i][j]=232, a1[j*4+i]=-30 BC=8, KC=8, Inverse difference a0[i][j]=8, a1[j*4+i]=109 Inverse: 32 differences Total: 647 differences The optimized Rijndael implementation does not agree with the reference implementation. FAIL: rijndael-check ccrypt: key does not match ./length-check.sh: test failed for file length 0. FAIL: length-check.sh ./ccrypt-check.sh:57: Action returned 4 instead of 0. ./ccrypt-check.sh: test failed. FAIL: ccrypt-check.sh Random seed: 1236549206 Passed. PASS: crypt3-check =================== 3 of 4 tests failed =================== make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Fehler 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/fab/rpmbuild/BUILD/ccrypt-1.7/check' make[1]: *** [check-am] Fehler 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/fab/rpmbuild/BUILD/ccrypt-1.7/check' -------%>--------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > - the failure on ppc64 is a result of buggy code in maketables or a bug in GCC > > in combination with our security related compiler flags and you can ask for > > access to ppc654 system on fedora-devel for further investigation > > so it's buggy code -> > the "r" array on line 133 (maketables.c) consists of too small members (word8) > for storing word32 values as returned by function multrot2113 Added a patch for this. Now it works on ppc64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review