[Bug 478852] Review Request: lpairs - Classical memory game with cards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478852


Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #11 from Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-03-07 13:34:52 EDT ---
- rpmlint output:

lpairs.src:77: W: macro-in-%changelog pre
lpairs.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 1)
lpairs.src: W: non-coherent-filename lpairs-1.0.4-5.src.rpm
lpairs-1.0.4-5.fc8.src.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

Please clean up mixed spaces and tabs; and macros in changelog.

+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
  %{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
  Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ File, containing the text of the licenses for the package is included in
  %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
  provided in the spec URL.

5eb00da9f7fc15dc5ce840c312e76cfa  lpairs-1.0.4.tar.gz
5eb00da9f7fc15dc5ce840c312e76cfa  lpairs-1.0.4.tar.gz.orig

+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
  one primary architecture (x86_64).
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ The spec file handles locales properly.
+ Does not contain shared libraries.
+ The package does not designed to be relocatable.
+ A package owns all directories that it creates.
+ A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ Does not contain large documentation files.
+ Includes only doc files in %doc.
+ No headers.
+ No static libraries.
+ The package does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files.
+ The package does not contain library files with a suffix (e.g.
  libfoo.so.1.1).
+ No devel packages.
+ The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
+ Includes %{name}.desktop file. Properly installed with desktop-file-install.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
  packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}.
+ All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8.

SHOULD:
Source package does not include CC-BY-SA license text and license for sounds as
a separate file from upstream, should query upstream to include it.


This package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]