[Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103





--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx>  2009-03-07 05:08:32 EDT ---
> -License:       GPLv2+
> +License:       GPLv2

Confirmed. The source files explicitly say "LICENSE: GPL Version 2".


> +%package devel

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package

> +Group:         Applications/Internet

That sounds wrong for the bnIRC-devel package. More likely the group is
"Development/Libraries". Even if the package contained just a plugin API, there
would not be a more accurate RPM Group.


> -%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
> -
> -%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig

Deleting them is not right. The previous .spec file was correct. Put them back.


> -%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}
> +%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/*

With this change, the directory is not included. Please revert.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories


> +%files devel
> +%defattr(-,root,root,-)
> +%{_prefix}/src/*

Don't include %_prefix/src. These are included in the automatically generated
-debuginfo package. If that doesn't work for you, install the
"redhat-rpm-config".


> +%{_libdir}/bnIRC/*

These are the application's plugins. They belong into the main package.


> +%{_libdir}/libbnirc.a
> +%{_libdir}/libbnirc.la

These are not needed and must not be included. You can %exclude it or remove it
in the %install section.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries


> +%{_libdir}/libbnirc.so

This is the softlink that really belongs into the -devel package. It is needed
when compiling/linking with -lbnirc


> +%{_libdir}/libbnirc.so.0
> +%{_libdir}/libbnirc.so.0.0.0

These two belong into the main application package.


Your %changelog doesn't comment on several of the spec changes between release
3 and 5. It is good practise to document and explain non-trivial modifications.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]