[Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683


Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bugs.michael@xxxxxxx
               Flag|needinfo?(bugs.michael@gmx. |
                   |net)                        |




--- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx>  2009-03-07 04:20:53 EDT ---
> Not sure what you mean. The whole sub-package seems to you
> useless, or you're pointing to the 'Require:' field?

The latter.

Why does a plain -doc package require the main library pkg? If it's just
packager's personal preference, I would understand if it required the -devel
package instead. Else it shouldn't require the library pkg as it doesn't need
it in any way.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]