Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #16 from Richard Hughes <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-07 03:56:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Indeed, but the state of specspo is a reason to reject this package not allow > it through. I don't understand why you keep referring to specspo. It's separate data about packages that doesn't really have a way of being tied to upstream. If the spec files were translated in CVS, and then specspo extracted the translations from the spec files (which are actively translated) and packaged it separately, then I would agree. But it's a separate project with no infrastructure tie in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review