Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Comment #96 from Deji Akingunola <dakingun@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-06 14:25:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #95) > == REVIEW == > ... > mpich2-libs.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/mpich2-64/mpicxx.conf > mpich2-libs.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/mpich2-64/mpif77.conf > mpich2-libs.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/mpich2-64/mpif90.conf > mpich2-libs.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/mpich2-64/mpixxx_opts.conf > > Please make those files be %config(noreplace), so if the user makes local > changes, they aren't overwritten on an update. > I actually want to make it so that they are overwritten on an update. These .conf files created at build-time based compilation options and other scenarios which may change during update/upgrade. We want people to go over their changes to the conf files after updates. > > However, your Source0: URL is wrong, it should be : > > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/mpich2/downloads/tarballs/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > Fixed. > > Show me a spec with the two items I noted resolved and I will approve this > package. > http://deji.fedorapeople.org/mpich2.spec Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review